1USERSReport R-0712-04
Generated July 12, 2026 · 4:40 PM EDT
Generated July 12, 2026 · 4:40 PM EDT
Nike · Shopping journey · New product evaluation
Four fixes put an estimated $184k back in play.
Thirty sessions agree: demand is healthy. Fit, comparison, and policy uncertainty are suppressing the final decision.Loading verified database...version pending · methodology pending
0 findings0 critic positions0 outcome receipts0 product versionsTask completion67%47 completed · 32 partial
Decision confidence58-26 points at size selection
Evidence coverage94%186 events · 74 comments
Modeled upside+18.7%engagement after top fixes
That sequence addresses 43 observed friction signals without increasing homepage density.
FIG. 3
Attention is healthy until comparison becomes work.
100attention index
Attention index (0-100)Journey stage
Landing
Ongoing research
Three reconciled reports · same journey definitionThe score moves as the product learns.
Current
+6Fit and policy retest
+9Baseline journey
BaselineThe product earns attention. The interface must earn the final decision.
Photography, material storytelling, and silhouette create strong first-party confidence. That advantage erodes when people must translate general promises into personal fit, use case, return risk, and delivery certainty.
Thesis
Move proof to the moment of choice. Do not add more persuasion upstream; reduce regret at the conversion control.
Product imagery builds confidence24 of 30 sessions
91Material story differentiates19 of 30 sessions
82Fit reassurance arrives too late17 of 30 sessions
34Policy scope is ambiguous14 of 30 sessions
41Comparison depends on memory12 of 30 sessions
3830sessions
Completed 47Partial 32Abandoned 21
Promise88+31
Browse84+24
Compare71+9
Fit49-26
Policy43-18
Checkout57+4