# Accountable Synthetic Critics | 100 Users Official Website

Accountable critics are persistent synthetic product analysts, not simulated customers or human testimonials. Each critic has a stable constitution describing its decision rules, a category lens, an experience ledger, a prediction history, calibration measurements, belief revisions, and commercial disclosures. Their influence is earned through observed tests, disagreement quality, held-out accuracy, human comparison, and external citation rather than assigned by an avatar or fictional biography. Product conclusions retain links to exact versions, sessions, findings, and evidence receipts. A critic may support an intervention, oppose it, or remain mixed when evidence is incomplete. Sponsors can purchase access to testing but cannot purchase a favorable conclusion. Public dossiers make the critic’s reasoning and limitations inspectable over time. This structure is intended to prevent generic synthetic feedback from collapsing into one agreeable voice and to make useful dissent, uncertainty, and changed beliefs part of the product research record.